##about.submissions##

##about.onlineSubmissions.registrationRequired##

##about.authorGuidelines##

The Sudan Journal of Medical Sciences (SJMS) is a project of the Continuous Medical Education program and an official scientific journal of the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences – Omdurman Islamic University. The SJMS is a regional, English-language journal with only the abstract translated and published in Arabic. The SJMS is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal publishing four issues per year since 2006. High-quality papers dealing with all aspects of medical sciences are welcomed. The main interest of the journal lies in articles that can improve clinical care or guide further research in Sudan and help in fighting and solving the health challenges that face Sudan and the regional area. A manuscript will be considered only with the understanding that it is an original contribution. 

  • Editorial policy: Information regarding reviewers will not be revealed. SJMS follows a double-blind peer-review system. Changing the authors' names, adding or deleting them is the responsibility of the corresponding author in agreement with the editorial office.

    The journal does not charge for the submission or processing of articles, however, for hard copies, a fee shall be payable by the author.

  • General information: The journal focuses on clinical research, case reports, reviews, letter to the editor, short communications, and editorials. All accepted manuscripts are requested to be proofread by the corresponding author. Researchers from Sudan and throughout the Middle East and Africa region can submit a manuscript if it falls within the scope of the journal.

    Submissions can be made through the online manuscript submission system, Authors, reviewers, and editors can correspond directly with each other through this system.
  • Peer-review process: The manuscript is assigned to the Editor-in-Chief, who reviews the manuscript and makes an initial decision based on the manuscript quality and editorial priorities. Manuscripts that pass initial evaluation are sent for peer-review process, and the Editor-in-Chief assigns an Associate Editor. The Associate Editor sends the manuscript to two reviewers (internal and/or external reviewers). Manuscripts will be reviewed by experts in the corresponding field of the manuscript. The reviewers must review the manuscript within 30 days. The Associate Editor recommends a decision based on the reviewers’ recommendations and returns the manuscript to the Editor-in-Chief. The Editor-in-Chief makes a final decision based on editorial priorities, manuscript quality, and reviewer recommendations. If there are any conflicting recommendations from reviewers, the Editor-in-Chief can assign a new reviewer. Information reading reviewer will not be revealed, it is a double-blind process. According to the reviewer's opinion, the accepted manuscript may be sent back to the author to adjust some details. The author should upload the revised files with a reply to each query of the reviewer. The author's revisions should be completed within 10 days after the request. If it is not received by the due date, there may be delays or rejection. The revision period can be extended after the submission of a request. The author may request another reviewer's opinion, and the editorial board has the right to approve or reject it. The Editorial Board has the full final decision on approval and rejection and might request further corrections if required. Statistical editing is also performed if needed by a biostatistician. The Editor-in-Chief, Associate Editors, biostatistics expert, and English language consultant may make minor corrections to accepted manuscripts that do not change the main text of the paper.

  • Copyrights: This is an open-access journal in which articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), where authors retain the copyright of their work, and this license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.

  • Open Access: The SJMS is an open-access journal. All published articles are freely available on the journal website without any charge. Articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), where authors retain the copyright of their work, and this license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited. To use the tables or figures of SJMS for scholarly, educational purposes, the process of permission requests to the publisher of SJMS is not necessary. All the content of the journal is available immediately upon publication.

  • Disclosure/Acknowledgement: Authors must provide disclosure/acknowledgement of the financial or material support, if any was received, for the current study. If the article includes any direct or indirect commercial links or if any institution provided material support to the study, authors must state in the cover letter that they have no relationship with the commercial product, drug, pharmaceutical company, etc., concerned; or specify the type of relationship (consultant, other agreements), if any.

  • Manuscript preparation:
    • The Editorial Policies and General Guidelines for manuscript preparation specified below are based on the “Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals (ICMJE Recommendations)” by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2013, archived at http://www.icmje.org/). The format of SJMS complies with the “Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals,” as published by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors in Vancouver, British Columbia in 1979 (the widely accepted “Vancouver style“), as described in the Annals of Internal Medicine (1982,96 [pt 1] 114–29) for guidance. Manuscripts, including tables, references, and figure legends, must be typewritten, double spaced, on 8 ½  x 11 inch (21.5 x 28 cm) on A4-size paper, with margins of at least one inch (2.5 cm). Times New Roman is the preferred font type with font size 12. Pages should be numbered consecutively, beginning with the title page, and continuing through the last page of typewritten material. All numbers should be written in Arabic numerals throughout the manuscripts and must be written in good English.

      Our preferred file format is DOCX or DOC. A single PDF file containing all materials in the manuscript including figures and figure legends should also be provided. Abbreviations should be avoided as much as possible. When used, the full expression of the abbreviations following the abbreviated word in parentheses should be given at the first use. Common abbreviations, however, may be used, such as DNA. Abbreviation can be used if it is listed as a MeSH subject heading. Authors should conform to the most recent edition of the American Medical Association Manual of Style.

      The sequence of the files should be as follows: cover letter (a must), title page file, manuscript (abstract and keywords, introduction, materials and methods, results, discussion, references, tables, and figures, other submission elements). Each section title should begin on a new page.

    • Cover letter: The covering letter must be addressed to the Sudan Journal of Medical Sciences (SJMS) demonstrating that the submitted work is original, important and not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The cover letter should include (1) statements about manuscript type, (2) single-journal submission affirmation, (3) conflict of interest statement, (4) sources of outside funding, (5) equipment (if applicable), and (6) approval of language for articles in English and approval of statistical analysis for original research articles.

    • Title page: The title page must contain: (1) the title of the article, (2) the correct names, official academic and/or clinical title, and email address of each author and the name and address of the institution(s), (3) the name and address of author to whom correspondence should be sent and his phone number, (4) any disclaimers (an example of a disclaimer is an author's statement that the views expressed in the submitted article are their own and not an official position of the institution or funder), (5) the clinical trial registration number, if applicable, and finally, (6) Each author's contributions should be stated as follows: (a) study concept and design or acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data, (b) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content, (c) final approval of the version to be published, and (d) agreement to be Accountable for the Accuracy and Integrity of all aspects of the work.

    • Abstract: An abstract of no more than 250 words should be submitted. It should be structured into the following four subsections: Background, Methods, Results, and Conclusions.

    • Keywords: 5–10 keywords may be provided.

    • Introduction

    • Materials and Methods: Authors should describe the objective of the study and hypothesis appropriately in the methodology section. The primary/secondary endpoints are predetermined sensibly according to the objective of the study.

    • Results: In the results sections, describe the statistical tests used in the study in detail so that the readers can get the same results if the original data are available. The name and version of the statistical package should be provided. The characteristics of measured variables should determine the use of a parametric or nonparametric statistical method. For an analysis of a continuous variable, the normality of data should be examined. The “P” value defined as the limit of significance along with appropriate indicators of measurement error and uncertainty (confidence interval, etc.) should be specified. Statistical terminology (random, significant, correlation, etc.) should not be used in non-statistical contexts. Designate the name and result of the method to test normality. When analyzing a categorical variable, if the number of events and samples is small, the exact test or asymptotic method with appropriate adjustments should be used. The standard chi-squared test or difference-in-proportions test may be performed only when the sample size and number of events are sufficiently large. A prior sample size calculation should be described in detail. The sample size calculation must aim at preventing false-negative results pertaining to the primary, instead of secondary, endpoint. Usually, the mean difference and standard deviation (SD) are typical parameters in estimating the effect size. The power must be equal to or greater than 80 percent. In the case of multiple comparisons, an adjusted level of significance is acceptable.

    • Discussion: The conclusion should be included in the discussion section.

    • Declaration section:

      • Acknowledgements: Contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should not be listed as authors, but they should be acknowledged under this section.
      • Ethical considerations: For human or animal research, the consent to participate or publication in case reports should be taken. Besides, the approval of the Ethical Committee should also be obtained.
      • Competing interests: Authors should disclose clearly: (1) any funding information or any relationship or activity that interferes with the study. Click here for more details.
      • Availability of data and material
      • Funding
      • Abbreviations and Symbols: It is recommended to use only standard abbreviations; the use of nonstandard abbreviations can be confusing to readers. Avoid abbreviations in the title of the manuscript. The spelled-out abbreviation followed by the abbreviation in parenthesis should be used on the first mention unless the abbreviation is a standard unit of measurement.
    • References: References are to be listed, double-spaced, in consecutive numerical order according to the order of citation in the manuscript. Once a reference is cited, all subsequent citations should be to the original number. All references must be cited in the text or tables and appear as superscript numbers between two square brackets. Unpublished data and personal communications will not be accepted as references. References (Vancouver style) to journal articles should follow this order: (1) authors, (2) title, (3) journal name (as abbreviated in Index Medicus), (4) year of publication, (5) volume and issue number, and (6) inclusive page numbers. References to books should include (1) authors, (2) chapter title (if any), (3) editor's names (if any), (4) title of the book, (5) city of publication, (6) publisher name, and (7) year of publication. Volume and edition numbers and specific page numbers should be included when appropriate. The authors are responsible for the correct textual citation.  The use of citation managers is encouraged.

    • Tables: Each table should be typed double-spaced, including all headings. Verify tabular statistics to make sure they match the data cited in the text. Tables should be placed after the Results section. Tables capture information concisely and display it efficiently; they also provide information at any desired level of detail and precision. Including data in tables rather than text frequently makes it possible to reduce the length of the text. Number tables consecutively in the order of their first citation in the text and supply a title for each. Titles in tables should be short but self-explanatory, containing information that allows readers to understand the table's content without having to go back to the text. Be sure that each table is cited in the text. Give each column a short or an abbreviated heading. Authors should place explanatory matter in footnotes, not in the heading. Explain all nonstandard abbreviations in footnotes and use symbols to explain information if needed. If you use data from another published or unpublished source, obtain permission and acknowledge that source fully. Additional tables containing backup data too extensive to publish in print may be appropriate for publication in the electronic version of the journal, deposited with an archival service, or made available to readers directly by the authors. An appropriate statement should be added to the text to inform readers that this additional information is available and where it is located.

    • Figures: The captions for the figures must be typed, double-spaced, and must not appear on the figures.  For X-ray films, scans, and other diagnostic images, as well as pictures of pathology specimens or photomicrographs, high-resolution photographic image files should be provided. Photomicrographs should have internal scale markers. Symbols, arrows, or letters used in photomicrographs should contrast with the background. Explain the internal scale and identify the method of staining in photomicrographs. Figures should be numbered consecutively according to the order in which they have been cited in the text. In the manuscript, the legends for illustrations should be on a separate page, with Arabic numerals corresponding to the illustrations. When symbols, arrows, numbers, or letters are used to identify parts of the illustrations, identify and explain each one clearly in the legend and send it in separate files. 

  • Types of manuscript and guidelines
    • Systematic review: Systematic reviews, as the name implies, typically involve a detailed and comprehensive plan and search strategy derived a priori, with the goal of reducing bias by identifying, appraising, and synthesizing all relevant studies on a particular topic. Systematic Reviews should address a specific question or issue that is relevant for clinical practice and provide an evidence-based, balanced, patient-oriented review on a focused topic. PRISMA statement of preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med 2009; 6(7): e1000097.) (http://www.prisma-statement.org/ ).

      MOOSE guidelines for meta-analysis and systematic reviews of observational studies (Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting Meta-analysis of observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 2000; 283: 2008-12).

    • Trials: CONSORT statement for randomized controlled trials (Moher D, Schultz KF, Altman D, for the CONSORT Group. The CONSORT statement revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials. JAMA 2001; 285: 1987-91) (http://www.consort-statement.org/)
    • Original research article: Research articles should report on original primary research. SJMS encourages that all datasets on which the conclusions of the paper rely should be available to readers. We encourage authors to ensure that their datasets are presented in the main manuscript or additional supporting files whenever possible.

      STARD checklist for the reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy (Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, et al., for the STARD Group. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Ann Intern Med 2003;138:40-4.) (http://www.stard-statement.org/);

      STROBE statement, a checklist of items that should be included in reports of observational studies (http://www.strobe-statement.org/)

    • Case report: Please ensure that all patient data have been de-identified and that necessary approval has been obtained, if necessary, from an ethics commission or an institutional review board. These guidelines are based on the CARE guidance.

    • Letter to the Editor: The Letters to the Editor should be short commentaries related to current developments in the medical field and their scientific and social aspects, they may be submitted to ask questions or offer further contributions in response to work that has been published in the Journal. Letters do not include a title or an abstract; they should not exceed 1,000 words and can have up to 5 references. The references in the letters should not exceed 15 words, figures, not more than two, and tables should not exceed two. The subdivisions of sections are encouraged to help orient the reader but should be general, such as “The Study” and “Conclusions.” Letters to the editor are generally updates on recent infectious disease trends and research but may also respond to recent articles published in SJMS.

    • Short  communications or commentaries

Please download and use the journal manuscript templates for Original Article, Case Report, and Review Article for submitting your manuscript to the journal.

These policies were revised and updated by the SJMS editorial board in July 2021.

Privacy Statement

The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used for the stated purposes of this journal. In addition, all authors submitting content will be automatically registered for content email alerts from SJMS. To stop receiving the alerts, authors can subsequently unsubscribe through the link provided in the email. These email addresses will not be made available to any other party.

##about.submissionPreparationChecklist##

[{"order":1,"content":"The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor)."},{"order":2,"content":"The submission file is in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, RTF, or WordPerfect document file format."},{"order":3,"content":"Where available, URLs for the references have been provided."},{"order":4,"content":"The text is single-spaced; uses a 12-point font; employs italics, rather than underlining (except with URL addresses); and all illustrations, figures, and tables are placed within the text at the appropriate points (after the results), rather than at the end."},{"order":5,"content":"Please, make sure that you included the implications of this research for the wider field in the conclusion."},{"order":6,"content":"The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines<\/a> section. "},{"order":12,"content":"The endnote references are styled according to the \r\njournal's style guide<\/a> ."},{"order":8,"content":"If submitting to a peer-reviewed section of the journal, the instructions in Ensuring a Blind Review<\/a> have been followed."},{"order":9,"content":"Please download the submission checklist form here<\/a> and upload the filled form at the next step along with the manuscript."},{"order":10,"content":"Please, upload the approval of the concerned ethical committee for the studies involving human or animal subjects."}]

Case Report

Please ensure that all patient data has been de-identified and that you obtained the necessary approval, if necessary, from an ethics commission or an institutional review board. The guidelines are based on CARE guidance.

Review Article

Review articles, as the name implies, typically involve a detailed and comprehensive plan and search strategy derived a priori, with the goal of reducing bias by identifying, appraising, and synthesizing all relevant studies on a particular topic. Review articles should address a specific question or issue that is relevant for clinical practice and provide an evidence-based, balanced, patient-oriented review on a focused topic. They can be systematic or narative or meta-analysis.

PRISMA statement of preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med 2009; 6(7): e1000097.) (http://www.prisma-statement.org/ ).

MOOSE guidelines for meta-analysis and systemic reviews of observational studies (Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting Meta-analysis of observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 2000; 283: 2008-12).

A letter to the Editor

Letters to the Editor may be submitted to ask questions or offer further contributions in response to work that has been published in the Journal. Letters do not include an abstract. The text for letters to the editor should not exceed a total 1,200 words. It includes references (not to exceed 15), figures (not more than 2) and tables (not to exceed 2). Subdivisions of sections are encouraged to help orient the reader but should be general, such as “The Study” and “Conclusions”. Letters to the editor are generally updates on recent infectious disease trends and research, but may also respond to recent articles published in SJMS.

Short communications or commentaries

Short  communications or commentaries are related to current developments in medical field and their scientific and social aspects.

It includes abstract, references (not to exceed 25), figures (not more than 2) and tables (not to exceed 2). The text for short communication or commentaries should not exceed a total 2,000 words.

Subdivisions of sections are encouraged to help orient the reader.

Clinical Trial

SJMS follows the CONSORT statement for randomized controlled trials (Moher D, Schultz KF, Altman D, for the CONSORT Group. The CONSORT statement revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials. JAMA 2001; 285: 1987-91) (http://www.consort-statement.org/).

Guest Editorial

Guest editorial is an invited editorial about specific important topic. It is seen by the Editor-In-Cheif. It does not require abstract. 

Book Review

book review is a decription, critical analysis, and/or evaluation of the quality, meaning, and significance of a book.

What should a good book review include?

The book's title and author. A brief summary of the plot that doesn't give away too much. Comments on the book's strengths and weaknesses. The reviewer's personal response to the book with specific examples to support praise or criticism.

Brief Report

Brief reports are similar to original research in that they follow the same rigor, format and guidelines, but are designed for small-scale research or research that is in early stages of development.  Brief reports are much shorter than manuscripts associated with a more advanced, larger-scale research project.

How do you write a brief report?

For a brief research report, you will probably include the following stages:

  1. Short summary. This summarizes the main points of the research. ...
  2. General background. This puts the research in the wider context by giving brief details of the subject and the state of present research.
  3. Purpose.
  4. Procedure.
  5. Results
  6. Conclusion.

##about.privacyStatement##

The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.